Coverting synapse conductances
Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 12:27 pm
Hi,
I am trying to recode a NEURON model in MATLAB (Thalamocortical and Thalamic Reticular Network (Destexhe et al 1996) http://senselab.med.yale.edu/modeldb/Sh ... model=3343).
The portion of the model I am trying to recode consists of single compartment RE and TC cells, with GABAa, AMPA, and GABAb synapses. Most all of the channel conductances are in mS/cm^2 (in some cases uS/cm^2, but I've converted these to mS/cm^2). However, the Kleak conductances and the synaptic conductances are listed simply in nS or mS. For example, the AMPA synapse to the RE cell has a conductance of 0.2 uS. In the paper they list the surface area of the RE cell as being 14,300 um^2. I converted this surface area to cm^2. Then I simply divided the conductance (.0002 mS) by the area (1.4300e-04 cm^2) to get the conductance in mS/cm2.
Should this work? Is this the right way to do it? Will the AMPA, Alpha and Beta values for the synaptic kinetics still be appropriate?
It appears to be the case that the AMPA current is too small, this may be due to the fraction of receptors that are active, with the values of Alpha and Beta used or because the conductance values are wrong. I find that if I either increase the AMPA conductance by quite a bit (a factor of ten) or increase the Alpha value that my results look more similar (but not the same) to the output of the model in NEURON; I suspect this is because the others synaptic currents may not be working exactly as they should be either.
Any help would be greatly appreciated as I have been trying to get this to work for quite a while now.
Thanks!
I am trying to recode a NEURON model in MATLAB (Thalamocortical and Thalamic Reticular Network (Destexhe et al 1996) http://senselab.med.yale.edu/modeldb/Sh ... model=3343).
The portion of the model I am trying to recode consists of single compartment RE and TC cells, with GABAa, AMPA, and GABAb synapses. Most all of the channel conductances are in mS/cm^2 (in some cases uS/cm^2, but I've converted these to mS/cm^2). However, the Kleak conductances and the synaptic conductances are listed simply in nS or mS. For example, the AMPA synapse to the RE cell has a conductance of 0.2 uS. In the paper they list the surface area of the RE cell as being 14,300 um^2. I converted this surface area to cm^2. Then I simply divided the conductance (.0002 mS) by the area (1.4300e-04 cm^2) to get the conductance in mS/cm2.
Should this work? Is this the right way to do it? Will the AMPA, Alpha and Beta values for the synaptic kinetics still be appropriate?
It appears to be the case that the AMPA current is too small, this may be due to the fraction of receptors that are active, with the values of Alpha and Beta used or because the conductance values are wrong. I find that if I either increase the AMPA conductance by quite a bit (a factor of ten) or increase the Alpha value that my results look more similar (but not the same) to the output of the model in NEURON; I suspect this is because the others synaptic currents may not be working exactly as they should be either.
Any help would be greatly appreciated as I have been trying to get this to work for quite a while now.
Thanks!